Exploring parent-engaged developmental monitoring of young children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, Porter Novelli Styles 2019 and 2021

Background Early identification of developmental delays may have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Parental engagement in developmental monitoring is a key component to successfully identifying developmental concerns. Objective /Hypothesis.The purpose of this project was to understand whether parental engagement in developmental monitoring changed over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, from Spring 2019 to Fall 2021. Methods Survey data was obtained from 2019 SpringStyles and 2021 FallStyles Porter Novelli Public Services ConsumerStyles cross-sectional surveys. Only respondents with at least one child under the age of 8 at the time of the survey were included in the analytic sample (2019 N = 403;2021 N = 344). Participants were asked several questions about how they monitor their children's development. Changes in frequency of developmental monitoring from 2019 to 2021 were estimated using chi-squared tests. Results In both 2019 and 2021, 89% of parents reported engaging in any type of developmental monitoring. Within the group of parents who engaged in any monitoring, there were no differences across years in the percentage of parents reporting using the methods surveyed, except that a smaller percentage reported comparing their children to others in 2021 (25%) compared to 2019 (36%, p <.002). Conclusions Despite major disruptions to families' lives, there were no significant changes to parents' overall engagement in developmental monitoring prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Super Enhanced Single Vision Lens 01 (SESL01) in reducing symptoms of computer vision syndrome (CVS): A study protocol for a double-blind, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The increased use of digital devices has implications for health and, particularly, the eyes, due to Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). Millions of individuals of all ages are at risk of CVS, and its prevalence ranges from 25% to 93%. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of the Super Enhanced Single Vision Lens 01 (SESL01) versus standard single vision lens in reducing symptoms of CVS assessed by the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q®) scores. METHOD: A double-blind, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial will be conducted at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston (UK), recruiting students and staff with CVS-Q score ≥ 6. A 1:1 randomization and a sample size of 300 participants will be sufficient to detect a 2-point difference in the CVS-Q score between the intervention and control groups with an alpha of 5%, two-sided, allowing for a dropout of 10%. The control group will use standard single vision lenses, and the intervention group SESL01. The primary outcome to week 14 will be the difference in the CVS-Q score between SESL01 and standard single vision lenses. Secondary outcomes include the percentage of participants with CVS-Q score < 6 (no symptoms) and CVS-Q score ≥ 6 (symptoms) in the SESL01 and the standard single vision group at weeks 6, 10 and 14; the percentage of participants in each group with a total CVS-Q score < 6, 6-12, 13-19, and ≥ 20 at weeks 6, 10 and 14. The primary analysis will be the intention to treat. DISCUSSION: Findings may inform decisions about adopting the SESL01 lenses to reduce CVS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT05545878. Registered: Sept. 19, 2022.

Duration of Behavioral Policy Interventions and Incidence of COVID-19 by Social Vulnerability of US Counties, April-December 2020.

OBJECTIVE: State-issued behavioral policy interventions (BPIs) can limit community spread of COVID-19, but their effects on COVID-19 transmission may vary by level of social vulnerability in the community. We examined the association between the duration of BPIs and the incidence of COVID-19 across levels of social vulnerability in US counties. METHODS: We used COVID-19 case counts from USAFacts and policy data on BPIs (face mask mandates, stay-at-home orders, gathering bans) in place from April through December 2020 and the 2018 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We conducted multilevel linear regression to estimate the associations between duration of each BPI and monthly incidence of COVID-19 (cases per 100 000 population) by SVI quartiles (grouped as low, moderate low, moderate high, and high social vulnerability) for 3141 US counties. RESULTS: Having a BPI in place for longer durations (ie, ≥2 months) was associated with lower incidence of COVID-19 compared with having a BPI in place for <1 month. Compared with having no BPI in place or a BPI in place for <1 month, differences in marginal mean monthly incidence of COVID-19 per 100 000 population for a BPI in place for ≥2 months ranged from -4 cases in counties with low SVI to -401 cases in counties with high SVI for face mask mandates, from -31 cases in counties with low SVI to -208 cases in counties with high SVI for stay-at-home orders, and from -227 cases in counties with low SVI to -628 cases in counties with high SVI for gathering bans. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing COVID-19 prevention measures for longer durations may help reduce COVID-19 transmission, especially in communities with high levels of social vulnerability.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Mitigation Efforts and Testing During an In-Person Training Event-Uganda, 12-29 October 2020.

Large public-health training events may result in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. Universal SARS-CoV-2 testing during trainings for the Uganda Population-based HIV Impact Assessment identified 28 of 475 (5.9%) individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among attendees; most (89.3%) were asymptomatic. Until COVID-19 vaccine is readily available for staff and participants, effective COVID-19 mitigation measures, along with SARS-CoV-2 testing, are recommended for in-person trainings, particularly when trainees will have subsequent contact with survey participants.